PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Economics2 citationsOpen Access

Multi-Criteria Performance Assessment of Beverage Companies Integrating Financial and Esg Indicators: A Hybrid Analytical Framework

MBMurat BelkeTGTuba GülcemalJBJurica Bosna

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a hybrid framework for assessing the performance of beverage companies by integrating financial and ESG indicators.
  • Implemented a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework.
  • Combined CRISUS and MAXC techniques with the CRADIS ranking algorithm.
  • Assessed performance indicators across four dimensions for companies listed on the London Stock Exchange.
  • Innovation, closing price, and community engagement emerged as key performance drivers.
  • Diageo ranked highest while Daniel Thwaites ranked lowest among the assessed companies.
  • Robustness analyses validated the model’s reliability and consistency for decision-making processes.

Abstract

Abstract This research introduces a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework for assessing the multidimensional performance of beverage companies listed on the London Stock Exchange, integrating financial metrics with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) indicators. The suggested approach combines two advanced objective weighting techniques—CRISUS and MAXC—with the CRADIS ranking algorithm, forming a robust and transparent decision-support structure. A total of 15 performance indicators spanning four dimensions (environmental, social, governance, and financial) were assessed for eight firms employing 2022 Refinitiv Eikon data. The framework captures the intrinsic structure of performance data, enabling reproducible and data-driven prioritization of criteria. Empirical findings reveal that innovation, closing price, and community engagement are the most influential drivers of performance, with Diageo ranking highest and Daniel Thwaites lowest. Robustness and sensitivity analyses confirm the model’s internal consistency and resistance to rank reversal, validating its reliability under varying parametric conditions. This research contributes to the MCDM literature by introducing a replicable, stakeholder-oriented, and sector-specific evaluation framework tailored to ESG-sensitive industries. The integration of financial and non-financial indicators within a unified structure enhances strategic relevance and supports evidence-based decision-making. Overall, the developed model provides actionable insights for executives, investors, and policy-makers seeking to assess corporate sustainability and competitiveness in complex decision environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Belke et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25b4996eeacc4fcec9d1ehttps://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2026-0009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper