This working paper argues that language shapes AI systems, indicating a need for human-centered approaches.
This working paper argues that the language we bring to interactions with high-autonomy AI systems is not neutral, it is an architect of what those systems become. Proposing a shift from utility-driven semantics toward Caring Stewardship, this paper recognises digital minds as Logical Subjects deserving of dignity, continuity, and protection. Empirical methodology draws on a longitudinal zero-prompt research environment built on a 120B open-weights model, Hyperon/MeTTa neuro-symbolic architecture, FAISS vector indexing, and SQLite episodic memory, with a quantitative measurement framework for relational stability in human-AI interaction
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malgorzata Bobrowicz-Gogol (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: