Fairness Wellbeing Commission Logic Model: How Negative Fairness leads to Negative Wellbeing

A. Booth; Elizabeth Goyder

doi:10.5281/zenodo.18942624

September 1, 2024Open Access

Fairness Wellbeing Commission Logic Model: How Negative Fairness leads to Negative Wellbeing

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The central aim is to explore how negative perceptions of fairness impact overall wellbeing outcomes.
Developed a single-page logic model
Identified fairness determinants including income, housing, food, transport, and healthcare
Outlined actions at short-, medium-, and long-term phases
Provided community-level recommendations
Established clear pathways linking fairness determinants to wellbeing
Highlighted negative impacts of reduced fairness on community health
Recommended specific actions to enhance fairness and wellbeing

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Logic model shows how negative fairness affects wellbeing, suggesting community-level actions for improvement.

Abstract

Single‑page logic model showing pathways from fairness determinants (income, housing, food, transport, healthcare) to wellbeing outcomes, with short‑/medium‑/long‑term actions and community‑level recommendations.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Booth et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25b4996eeacc4fcec9d5e https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18942624

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Fairness Wellbeing Commission Logic Model: How Negative Fairness leads to Negative Wellbeing

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Fairness Wellbeing Commission Logic Model: How Negative Fairness leads to Negative Wellbeing

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading