Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Derives toxicity thresholds for hexabromocyclododecane in humans, highlighting health risk implications.
Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), a prevalent brominated flame retardant, consists predominantly of three isomers: α-HBCD, β-HBCD, and γ-HBCD. The paucity of health-based guidance values (HBGVs) currently hinders the evaluation of human health risks associated with HBCD exposure. The aim of this study was to develop a human multiroute physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model for HBCD to extrapolate HBGVs. The study involved (1) the construction of PBTK models for the oral exposure of α-HBCD, β-HBCD, and γ-HBCD in mice, followed by parameter calibration using the particle swarm optimization algorithm and subsequent validation, (2) the extrapolation of these models to formulate a human oral exposure model, and (3) the incorporation of the human respiratory tract (HRT) model to establish the human multiroute PBTK model. The model’s precision was evaluated, with a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 69.0% between the observed and simulated values, and 59.0% of the simulated values fell within the 2-fold error range of the observed values. Cross-species and cross-route extrapolations were then performed to derive biomonitoring equivalent values, reference doses, and reference concentrations for multiple systemic toxicity effects to assess the potential health risks of HBCD. • The mouse model refines several metabolic pathways and first-pass effects. • The first human multiroute HBCD PBTK model incorporating α, β, and γ-HBCD. • Human toxicity parameters of HBCD extrapolated from mouse data by the PBTK model. • Derive BE values considering ADME process for human biological monitoring. • Allocate the internal load to the oral and inhalation routes to derive RfD and RfC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: