PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Frontiers in Human Dynamics1 citationsOpen Access

AI smart glasses, ambient computing, and the public sphere: a mini review of media governance challenges

SSSamira SetoutahUniversity of SharjahEMElsir Ali Saad MohamedUmm al-Qura UniversityKIKhalid Ibrahim Abdelaziz IshagUnited Arab Emirates University

Key Points

  • The review aims to examine how AI smart glasses transform interactions in public spaces and pose governance challenges.
  • Analyzed peer-reviewed research from 2022 to 2025
  • Reviewed regulatory and technical sources related to smart glasses
  • Utilized critical media theory concepts to analyze findings
  • Identified challenges in privacy, consent, and algorithmic bias linked to AI smart glasses
  • Highlighted shifts in media governance due to the technology’s immersive nature
  • Argued for proactive governance to tackle societal implications of AI-mediated perception

Abstract

AI-powered smart glasses are increasingly positioned as central interfaces within the paradigm of ambient computing, signaling a transition from smartphone-centric interaction toward continuous, context-aware mediation embedded in everyday environments. Drawing on peer-reviewed research published between 2022 and 2025, alongside selected regulatory, market, and technical sources, this article examines how AI smart glasses reconfigure visibility, datafication, and communicative power in public and semi-public spaces. Grounded in critical media theory—including remediation, the attention economy, surveillance capitalism, data colonialism, and critical algorithm studies—the review conceptualizes smart glasses as ambient media infrastructures rather than neutral consumer devices. The analysis demonstrates that these technologies intensify long-standing media governance challenges by relocating mediation from screens to first-person perceptual layers, raising urgent questions about privacy, consent, algorithmic bias, data sovereignty, and democratic participation. By situating AI smart glasses within debates on platform power and the public sphere, the article argues for proactive, participatory, and infrastructure-level governance frameworks capable of addressing the societal implications of ambient AI-mediated perception.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Setoutah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3aad702a1e69014ccb843https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2026.1695869
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper