Research reveals enhanced N-terminal reactivity of NHS carbamates in protein cross-linking, indicating potential applications in chemical proteomics.
Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) has emerged as a powerful approach for probing protein structure and conformational dynamics. Conventional cross-linkers typically contain two N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester groups that primarily target lysine residues. Here, we report the optimization of the in-solution reactivity of disuccinimidyl sulfoxide carbamate (DSSO-carbamate), an analogue of DSSO in which the two NHS ester groups are replaced by NHS carbamates. The enhanced stability of the carbamate functionality reduces the degradation of DSSO through retro-ene sulfoxide elimination under standard XL-MS buffer conditions, thereby improving cross-linking efficiency. We further characterized the gas-phase dissociation behavior of DSSO-carbamate and optimized the collision energy (CE) parameters for automated data analysis with XL-MS search engines. Mapping of cross-linking sites for bovine serum albumin revealed an unexpectedly high frequency of cross-links involving the protein N-terminus, suggesting increased N-terminal reactivity of NHS carbamates relative to NHS esters. This hypothesis was corroborated by comparative cross-linking of nonacetylated and N-terminally acetylated α-synuclein using DSSO-carbamate and the NHS ester-based disuccinimidyl dibutyric urea (DSBU). We observed the same reactivity trend for the NHS carbamate-based cross-linker NNP9. Proteome-wide XL-MS analysis confirmed a higher propensity of NHS carbamate-based reagents to form cross-links with protein N-termini compared to NHS ester-based cross-linkers. Together, these results show that NHS carbamate-based reagents provide complementary XL-MS restraints to NHS ester-based cross-linkers and are particularly useful for investigating systems where N-terminal interactions are functionally relevant. We anticipate that this unique N-terminal selectivity of NHS carbamates will find broader applications in bioconjugation and chemical proteomics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ianni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: