Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarking study assesses object detection accuracy in video analytics under different compression qualities, suggesting optimal model use.
Summary Video analytics (VA) systems are becoming increasingly reliant on deep‐neural‐network‐based object detection, where video compression parameters such as resolution, bitrate, and quantization significantly affect inference accuracy. This paper presents a benchmarking study on five object detection models, namely Fast R‐CNN, EfficientDet, YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and DETR, which were evaluated using three encoder‐defined video quality levels (High, Medium, and Low). Performance was assessed using bitrate (Mbps), peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR, dB), and detection accuracy to provide a reproducible framework for analyzing compression‐induced performance variations. Experimental results reveal that PSNR scales approximately linearly with bitrate, whereas detection accuracy exhibits saturation with diminishing returns at higher bitrates. YOLOv5 exhibited the highest robustness to compression, followed by Fast R‐CNN and DETR, whereas EfficientDet and YOLOv8 were more sensitive to quality degradation. We identify practical operating points that balance accuracy and bandwidth efficiency, providing actionable guidance for model–codec co‐design in surveillance and smart‐city VA applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masykuroh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: