Formalization of control framework reveals that innovation is essential for coherence in organizations.
We formalize a discrete resolution view of control, learning, and innovation in which each observation or decision is a binary resolution act: coherent (C) if it confirms the current model and requires no forced re-resolution, or decoherence (D) if it forces re-resolution (rework, redesign, exception handling, escalation, workaround). Leaving the control of time-domain statistical processes, we define collapse as exceeding an allowable decoherence density threshold in resolution depth. We prove that driving density based collapse risk to zero requires the expected cumulative decoherence mass to grow slower than the allowable budget, which in turn necessitates persistent constraint creation. In this framework, innovation is not an organizational preference but a mathematical requirement for asymptotic coherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozcan Ozok (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: