Key result
High LLT adherence is linked to ~$1,000 lower annualized all-cause healthcare costs vs. low adherence.
Why the study?
Does high adherence to lipid-lowering therapy reduce healthcare costs in adults with or at risk for ASCVD?
Cohort
Does high adherence to lipid-lowering therapy reduce healthcare costs in adults with or at risk for ASCVD?
High adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and optimal LDL-C management are associated with significantly lower healthcare costs in patients with or at risk for ASCVD.
Guideline-recommended lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) can reduce healthcare utilization and costs for patients with and at-risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We examined healthcare utilization and associated costs among adult LLT users in Kaiser Permanente Southern California ≥21 years of age having ASCVD or intermediate (≥7.5% to <20%) or high (≥20%) 10-year ASCVD risk between 2015 and 2021. LLT adherence trajectories were determined using group-based trajectory modeling over 12 months. All-cause and ASCVD-related annualized adjusted costs were calculated through 2023. High versus low LLT adherence was associated with lower all-cause costs (−$999; 95% CI: −$1100, −$897) and varied across subgroups by ASCVD risk. Adults missing a follow-up low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measure had +$8312 (95% CI +$7955, +$8669) higher all-cause costs compared to adults with LDL-C < 55 mg/dL. Improving LDL-C management through optimized LLT treatment strategies can reduce economic burdens in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mefford et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ASCVD or intermediate/high 10-year ASCVD risk. High lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) adherence vs. Low LLT adherence was evaluated on All-cause annualized adjusted costs (MD -$999, 95% CI -1100 to -897). High lipid-lowering therapy adherence was associated with lower all-cause annualized adjusted costs compared to low adherence (difference -$999; 95% CI -$1100 to -$897).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: