This article establishes a framework for accountability and normative agency, highlighting implications for AI and ethical systems.
This article establishes the ontological-ethical architecture of the Noumostásia Framework, grounding operational protocols in accountability, vulnerability, and the Human Calibration Mechanism (HCM). It argues that true normative agency is exclusively embodied, and that procedural systems (including AI) remain derivative. Article 3 of 3. Related: Article 1 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18776821.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ionel P. Pop (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: