PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Air0 citationsOpen Access

A GraphRAG-Based Question-Answering System for Explainable and Advanced Reasoning over Air Quality Insights

View Full Paper
CMChristos MountzourisGPGrigorios ProtopsaltisJGJohn V. Gialelis

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a GraphRAG-based question-answering system to analyze indoor air quality data.
  • Developed a knowledge graph specific to indoor air quality concepts and relationships.
  • Utilized a retrieval-augmented generation framework for enhanced natural language processing.
  • Evaluated the system's performance in both information retrieval and answer generation stages.
  • Achieved a context recall of 0.914 in the retrieval mechanism.
  • Obtained a precision score of 0.838 during retrieval.
  • Attained a faithfulness score of 0.906 in the generation mechanism.
  • Achieved an answer relevancy score of 0.891.

Abstract

Exposure to poor indoor air quality (IAQ) conditions represents a major public health concern, with adverse effects on human health and well-being. The adoption of innovative technological solutions can support timely risk awareness, enable informed decision-making, and ultimately mitigate this health burden. In this context, Large Language Models (LLMs) emerge as a promising technological avenue through the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm, which extends their inherent natural language understanding capabilities with explicit access to external knowledge bases, enabling evidence-grounded reasoning and informed recommendations. The present work introduces an integrated GraphRAG-based Question Answering (QA) system that couples a domain-specific knowledge graph encoding fundamental IAQ concepts and relationships with a RAG-based natural language interface, thereby enabling explainable, context-aware, and advanced analytical reasoning over IAQ data. The evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed QA system across both retrieval and generation stages. The retrieval mechanism achieved a context recall of 0.914 and a precision of 0.838, while the generation mechanism attained a faithfulness score of 0.906 and an answer relevancy score of 0.891.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mountzouris et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac9002a1e69014cce579https://doi.org/10.3390/air4010006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper