Autologous foot grafting confers durable, site-specific benefits nearly a decade post-procedure. Heel grafting restores long-term function, whereas forefoot grafting primarily improves cosmesis. Importantly, timing of grafting (immediate vs. delayed) does not alter durability, underscoring the need for location-specific treatment counseling and potential repeat procedures in forefoot patients.
Eyiba et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: