PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging3 citationsOpen Access

Molecular imaging of lymphatic organs provides prognostic value after acute myocardial infarction

TRTheresa ReiterADAnna-Lena DörrlerNHNatalie Hasenauer

Key Points

  • This trial aims to assess the prognostic significance of lymphatic organ imaging in identifying recovery outcomes following acute myocardial infarction.
  • 41 patients with ST-elevation AMI underwent C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 directed 68 Ga-PentixaFor PET imaging.
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and again at six and twelve months to measure left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size.
  • An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥ 5% was defined as recovery, analyzed alongside lymphatic organ uptake and conventional biomarkers.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly from 50.4% at baseline to 54.2% at six months and 54.3% at twelve months.
  • Lymphatic organ uptake was associated with recovery outcomes, with significant odds ratios indicating predictive value at univariate analysis.
  • Established biomarkers like infarct size and inflammatory markers did not significantly correlate with functional recovery.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) triggers local inflammation in the injured myocardium, followed by a systemic inflammatory response of lymphatic organs. This prospective trial (NCT05519735) focused on molecular imaging of lymphatic organs (spleen, bone marrow, and heart-draining lymph nodes) and aimed to determine whether uptake in such remote organs identifies individuals predisposed to functional recovery during follow-up after AMI. Methods 41 timely re-perfused ST-elevation AMI patients received baseline C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 directed 68 Ga-PentixaFor PET, a radiotracer targeting a broad spectrum of leukocytes. To determine left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and infarct size, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at baseline and repeated after six (follow-up (FU) 1, available in 38/41) and twelve months (FU 2, available in 36/41). As endpoint, an LVEF increase of ≥ 5% relative to baseline was defined as short- (at FU 1) and long-term functional (at FU 2) recovery. We also determined association of 68 Ga-PentixaFor uptake in lymphatic organs with outcome relative to established clinical and imaging biomarkers. Results LVEF at baseline was 50.4 ± 8.7% (range 34–65%). At FU 1, LVEF improved significantly (54.2 ± 7.1%, P = 0.0004 vs. baseline) and the endpoint was recorded in 21/38 patients. Univariate analysis identified baseline LVEF (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.80, P = 0.002) and uptake derived from heart-draining lymph nodes (OR, 0.21, P = 0.03) as predictor of functional recovery, while only LVEF reached significance at multivariate analysis (OR, 0.72, P = 0.007). At FU 2, LVEF also improved to 54.3 ± 7.3% relative to baseline ( P = 0.006) and the endpoint was met in 21/36 patients. Baseline LVEF (OR 0.84, P = 0.005) and splenic PET signal (OR, 2.46, P = 0.04) provided prognostic value at univariate analysis. Both parameters remained significant at multivariate outcome analysis (LVEF: OR, 0.73, P = 0.01; spleen: OR, 4.17, P = 0.04), indicating that baseline LVEF and splenic uptake are prognostic for improved long-term functional outcome. Established risk factors of cardiac damage (infarct size) or inflammation (C-reactive protein, white blood cell counts) failed to reach significance for functional recovery at both follow-up time-points. Conclusions Inflammatory imaging in lymphatic organs may provide a complementary in-vivo biomarker for functional recovery and seems to be more strongly associated with outcome relative to standard markers of cardiac damage or inflammation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Reiter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ace502a1e69014cceeefhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-07809-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper