Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares infrared retort and conventional methods for canned fish quality, suggesting improvements for food preservation.
Recently, the infrared‐based retort (RIR) was developed for sustainable food production in the canning process. However, its industrial applications require assessing its effects on product properties during storage. This study aims to comparatively evaluate the novel RIR and conventional retort (CR) for canned Talang Queenfish's quality parameters and to define optimal processing conditions by altering sterilization temperature (110°C–121°C) and time (10–20 min) to minimize peroxide value (PV), acid value (AV), free fatty acid (FFA), thiobarbituric acid (TBA), total volatile nitrogen (TVN), and maintain acceptable pH. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and sensory evaluation were also performed, and the products were assessed monthly during a 1‐year storage period. The optimal product was achieved at 116.5°C/15.6 min, with significantly ( p < 0.05) extended shelf‐life and reduced PV, AV, FFA, TBA, TVN, with a slight decrease in pH compared to CR. SEM revealed that the RIR product exhibited more organized cellular structure with a smoother surface. Despite the similarity of spectra, FTIR analysis indicated differences in functunal group characteristics between RIR and CR samples, particularly in hydroxyl and carbonyl regions. RIR‐sterilized fish achieved higher overall acceptance sensory score than CR (8.9 ± 0.6 vs. 7.4 ± 0.8). Results indicate RIR capability for practical applications and contribution to food quality enhancement and waste reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Mtury et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: