Meta-analysis reveals positive effect size for social studies interventions on learning outcomes in secondary students, implying effective teaching strategies.
A range of social studies interventions have been researched to support students’ learning and improve teachers’ instruction. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of these interventions on secondary students’ learning. A systematic literature search identified 68 studies with 77 independent samples and 146 effect sizes for students in Grades 6 to 12. Using random-effects robust variance estimation (RVE), we found that social studies interventions had a positive, medium effect size (g = .54) on student learning outcomes. Moderator analyses examined factors like grade level, domain, implementer, intervention duration, measured constructs, publication type, and study quality. Results showed greater effectiveness for content acquisition (g = .58) and social studies writing (g = .58) than for reading comprehension (g = .05). Except for measured constructs, other moderators were not significant. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: