Language plays a central role in how neurodivergent individuals express identity and belonging. Although terminology such as neurodivergent and neurodiverse has become increasingly common, little empirical research has examined how these and related terms are perceived within and across neurodivergent communities. This exploratory study surveyed 740 adults with a diagnosis of autism ( n = 189), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) ( n = 190), dyslexia ( n = 179), or co-occurring autism and ADHD ( n = 182) from the United Kingdom and United States to assess preferences, offensiveness, acceptability, and self-use of six neurodiversity-related terms. Participants rated neurodivergent and neurodiverse as the most preferred, least offensive, and most acceptable, whereas neurominority and neurospicy were least endorsed. The overall order of preferences was largely consistent across diagnostic groups, gender identities, and countries, though group-level differences emerged for specific terms. Dyslexic participants rated neurodivergent and neurodiverse less positively than other groups, while the Autistic + ADHD group expressed the strongest endorsement of neurodivergent . Participants reported infrequent use of any of these labels to describe themselves, suggesting that while certain terms are broadly acceptable, they may not yet serve as primary identity markers. Overall, findings indicate strong agreement, with neurodivergent emerging as the most accepted term. Lay Abstract Language is important to how neurodivergent people express who they are and how they connect with others. Although words like neurodivergent and neurodiverse are now common in education, workplaces, and policy, we still know little about how people in these communities feel about them. This study explored the views of 740 adults with lived experience of autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia, or both autism and ADHD. Participants were asked which terms they preferred, which they found offensive, and how acceptable they found six commonly used terms describing neurodiversity: neurodiverse , neurodivergent , neurodistinct , neuroatypical , neurospicy , and neurominority . Overall, neurodivergent was rated as the most positive, least offensive, and most acceptable term, followed by neurodiverse . In contrast, neurominority and neurospicy were viewed less favourably. Participants were also asked how often they use neurodiversity terms to describe themselves. These terms were generally used infrequently, with people identifying as both Autistic and ADHD more likely to use them, and people with dyslexia less likely to do so. Most participants agreed that neurodivergent was the most acceptable term overall. However, more work is needed to understand why people prefer certain words and what influences whether they use them in daily life. This study provides useful guidance for choosing respectful and inclusive language when describing neurodivergent people in policy, education, and practice.
Bury et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: