Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrolytic process boosts antimony production rate amid reduced environmental impact, suggesting a sustainable strategy.
The conventional pyrometallurgical production of antimony is energy-intensive and heavily reliant on carbon, resulting in significant CO2 emissions and environmental toxicity concerns. Herein, we engineer a transformative electrolytic process that simultaneously addresses energy efficiency and environmental impact. This process leverages the unique properties of antimony oxide (Sb2O3), which serves as a self-sustaining, fluoride- and chloride-free electrolyte at 800 °C. Furthermore, we introduce carbon dioxide (CO2) not as a waste gas, but as a process-intensifying mediator. Under a 1 atm CO2 atmosphere, the dissolved gas drastically enhances anode bubble dynamics and initiates a strengthening cycle, enabling a dual-path (electrochemical and chemical) reduction mechanism. This engineered system achieves a landmark 937% increase in production rate and reduces the specific energy consumption to 52.35 kW·h/t-Sb. Most significantly, compared with the energy consumption of traditional smelting, the total carbon consumption of this process is only 57.95 kgce/t-Sb, representing a reduction of approximately 84.5% compared to conventional pyrometallurgy (304.44 kgce/t-Sb). Synergy with eutectic carbonate salts (e.g., K2CO3–Li2CO3) further intensified the process. Our work exemplifies how chemical engineering principles can be harnessed to create a quantifiably more sustainable and industrially viable metal production pathway, turning a greenhouse gas into a key process ingredient for green metallurgy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: