Background: Antithrombotic therapy is a risk factor for subdural hematoma after head injury. Methods: We retrospectively studied 180 consecutive patients with traumatic acute subdural hematoma. Results: The median age was 81 years, 68 (38%) were female, and 44% were on antithrombotic therapy. In the antithrombotic therapy group, the patients were significantly older (84, 77–88 vs. 78, 74–84, p value = 0.00104), and the proportion of minor injury was significantly higher (83% vs. 61%, p value = 0.00178). Poor clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (44% vs. 41%; p value = 0.762). In multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, poor outcomes (42%) were associated with the first Glasgow coma scale scores (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65–0.82, p value < 0.001) and the first CT findings (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.98–11.8, p value < 0.001), but not with antithrombotic therapy (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.61–3.60, p value = 0.390). Of the 97 patients treated conservatively for more than 2 weeks, surgical intervention in the chronic phase was higher in the antithrombotic therapy group (16% vs. 1.9%; p value = 0.0230). The timing of re-administration did not correlate with the incidence of chronic surgical intervention (within 2 weeks: 18%; over 2 weeks: 9.1%; p value = 0.663). Conclusions: The proportion of minor injury was significantly higher in the antithrombotic therapy group than in the non-medication group. Antithrombotic therapy was not associated with poor outcome but correlated with the increased risk of surgical intervention in the chronic phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: