PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of low frequency noise, vibration and active control2 citationsOpen Access

Wheelbase-preview predictive controller for active suspension incorporating road profile estimation

View Full Paper
LYL. YangHCHao ChenLLLang Liu

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a predictive model for active suspension systems that incorporates road profile estimation.
  • Proposes a wheelbase-preview predictive controller (WPMPC) for active suspension control.
  • Estimates road profile and suspension states using an augmented Kalman filter method.
  • Establishes a predictive model using estimated states and in-wheel base information.
  • Improved the root mean square (RMS) of acceleration by over 3.68%.
  • Enhanced dynamic deflection of suspension by 6.91%.
  • Increased relative dynamic load of rear suspension by 13.53%, compared to traditional MPC and LQR.

Abstract

Active suspensions in vehicles can apply a vertical force between the wheel and the vehicle body to reduce vehicle body motion over road obstacles, enhancing ride comfort. To incorporate road profile estimation into active suspension control, this paper proposes a wheelbase-preview predictive controller (WPMPC). The road profile of the front wheel and suspension states are estimated using the augmented Kalman filter method with the control item. Consequently, the estimated profile information from the front wheels is used to obtain the in-wheel base information by shift register. Further, the wheelbase-preview predictive model is established, involving the estimated states and in-wheelbase information. The corresponding WPMPC is formulated with the physical constraints and the dynamic deflection of suspension. The Adams-Simulink co-simulation platform is built. The comparisons are conducted on the random and impact road. The results show that the proposed algorithm has improved the root mean square (RMS) of the acceleration, dynamic deflection, and relative dynamic load of rear suspension by more than 3.68%, 6.91%, and 13.53%, compared to the traditional MPC and LQR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ada918185d8a39801430https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484261430972
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper