Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AZD3199 demonstrates rapid onset of action and high selectivity in lung models, suggesting enhanced efficacy over salmeterol.
Background: β 2 -agonists are standard treatments for asthma and COPD and are varyingly optimized for a number of key pharmacological properties, such as receptor selectivity, systemic exposure, onset of action and duration of effect. AZD3199 is a novel ultra long acting β 2 -agonist (uLABA) with improved properties designed to combine 24 hour duration of effect with low systemic exposure and an onset of action similarly rapid to that of formoterol. Methods: The affinity, potency and efficacy of AZD3199 were measured at human β-adrenergic receptors. Onset of action was measured as relaxation of constricted guinea pig trachea and human bronchial tissue. Activity at the hERG voltage-dependent potassium channel was determined using electrophysiology. Plasma protein binding was measured in multiple species. Results: AZD3199 was a potent agonist (6 nM EC 50 ) at the human β 2 receptor with an intrinsic activity of 0.8 relative to formoterol. AZD3199 had a rapid onset of action in both guinea pig (22 min) and human (11 min) lung tissue, very similar to formoterol (G-Pig 23 min, human 13 min) and significantly faster than salmeterol (>100 min in both). Similar β 2 -agonist activity was seen across multiple species including guinea pig, rat, dog, mouse and rabbit. AZD3199 was highly selective (>1500 fold affinity) for the human β 2 receptor over human β 1 and β 3 - receptors with no agonism at either receptor. No activity was seen at the hERG channel at concentrations up to 26 μM. High plasma protein binding (>90%) was seen across multiple species offering the potential for reduced systemic exposure. Conclusion: AZD3199 is a potent and selective uLABA with an onset of action similar to that of formoterol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: