Computational analysis reveals Lupeol and Alpha-tocopherol show strong binding affinity, suggesting potential in renal protection.
Background: The present study investigates the nephroprotective and antiurolithic potential of selected phytochemicals from Diplazium esculentum using in silico molecular docking and molecular dynamics-based stability evaluation. Materials and Methods: Computational molecular docking was performed on major bioactive constituents of Diplazium esculentum , including Sinapic acid, Lupeol, Alpha-tocopherol, and Palmitic acid. Two key protein targets associated with renal inflammation and urolithiasis viz. NF-κB (PDB ID: 1SVC) and human soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH; PDB ID: 1S8O) were selected. Docking scores and interaction profiles were analyzed and compared with known standard inhibitors (BAY 11-7082 for NF-κB and AUDA for sEH). Results: Docking analysis revealed that Lupeol exhibited the strongest binding affinity toward NF-κB with a docking score of −4.99 kcal/mol, followed by Sinapic acid (−4.77 kcal/mol) and Alpha-tocopherol (−4.49 kcal/mol), compared to the standard BAY 11-7082 (−5.9 kcal/mol). Against sEH, Lupeol demonstrated a docking score of −6.19 kcal/mol, while Sinapic acid (−4.58 kcal/mol) and Alpha-tocopherol (−4.04 kcal/mol) showed moderate affinity relative to the reference inhibitor AUDA (−6.9 kcal/mol). Key hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were observed within the active sites of both targets, supporting stable ligand–protein associations. Conclusions: The findings suggest that Lupeol, Sinapic acid, and Alpha-tocopherol possess promising binding potential against molecular targets involved in renal inflammation and kidney stone formation. This in silico evidence provides a mechanistic basis for the nephroprotective and antiurolithic potential of Diplazium esculentum phytochemicals and warrants further experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
mollah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: