Cross-sectional study identifies key factors like education and transport challenges affecting antenatal care access in Zimbabwe.
Background: Timely initiation of antenatal care is critical for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Despite this, late initiation remains a significant public health challenge in rural Zimbabwe. This study aimed to assess the determinants of late antenatal care bookings among pregnant women in Mangwe District in 2025. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2024 and June 2025 among 171 pregnant women selected through systematic random sampling from five clinics. Data on socio-demographics, accessibility, and maternal factors were collected using a structured questionnaire deployed on Kobo Collect. The outcome variable was the timing of the first antenatal care visit, categorized as “late” (>20 weeks gestation). Data was analyzed in STATA version 15, using chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression to identify factors associated with late booking. Results: The prevalence of late antenatal care bookings was 50.9%. Significant determinants included lower educational attainment ( p = 0.009), unemployment ( p = 0.030), and a lack of knowledge about the importance of early antenatal care ( p = 0.001). While not statistically significant in the final model, logistical barriers were highly prevalent, with 47.8% of late bookers reporting challenges in accessing care, primarily due to long distances and lack of transportation. Conclusion: Five in 10 women had late antenatal care bookings in Mangwe District, which is predominantly driven by educational, economic, and knowledge-based barriers. To decrease late antenatal care bookings, interventions must prioritize targeted community health education, economic empowerment initiatives, and practical solutions to overcome transport and distance challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sibanda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: