Numerical investigation reveals how increased development length improves anchorage performance in rebar hooks, suggesting better stress distribution and delayed crack propagation.
This study numerically examined the anchorage mechanism of rebar hooks under varying straight development lengths, including high stress levels. A three-dimensional rigid body spring model (3D RBSM) was used for the investigation and successfully reproduced the experimental pullout test stress–slip relationships and inner–outer strain distributions for the rebar hook with and without a straight development length. A validated numerical model was used to assess local concrete stresses and internal crack propagation, enabling a clear interpretation of how straight development length influences the anchorage mechanism. The results revealed that increasing straight development length increases stiffness, reduces rebar strains and concrete stresses in the hook region, promotes crack formation around the rebar surface, and forms maximum tensile stresses closer to the top surface, ultimately resulting in earlier splitting failure at high rebar stress levels. A comparison of cases with and without hooks shows that combining the hook with straight development length improves stress distribution, delays crack propagation, and increases anchorage by reducing tensile stress concentrations near the top surface and side faces. These findings provide valuable insights into the role of straight development length in the anchorage performance of 180-degree rebar hooks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeygunawardana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: