PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Hepatology Research3 citations

Using Serum Creatinine‐to‐Cystatin C Ratio to Predict Sarcopenia in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis

View Full Paper
ASAkihiko ShibamotoTNTadashi NamisakiMTMasayoshi Takami

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the significance of the serum creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio as a marker of sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients.
  • Assessed handgrip strength and skeletal muscle mass index in 195 patients with cirrhosis
  • Divided patients into sarcopenia (70) and nonsarcopenia (125) groups
  • Identified risk factors for sarcopenia using multivariable logistic regression analyses
  • Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 70 out of 195 patients (35.9%)
  • Patients with sarcopenia had lower body mass index, serum creatinine, and creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio
  • Overall survival was significantly lower in patients with low creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (< 0.66)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim The creatinine‐to‐cystatin C ratio (CCR) is considered a convenient surrogate marker for muscle mass, although its evidence in cirrhotic populations is limited. This study investigated the significance of CCR as a marker of sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. Methods Handgrip strength (HGS) and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) were assessed in 195 patients with cirrhosis, divided into the sarcopenia ( n = 70) and nonsarcopenia ( n = 125) groups. Risk factors associated with sarcopenia were identified through multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 70 out of 195 patients (35.9%). Patients with sarcopenia were significantly older, with lower body mass index (BMI), serum creatinine, and CCR, as well as higher albumin–bilirubin scores. Age ≥ 65 years, BMI < 25, and low CCR (< 0.63 in women, < 0.68 in men) were independently associated with sarcopenia on both univariable and multivariable analyses. The predictive accuracy of CCR for sarcopenia was comparable to that of a multivariable model combining age and BMI. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, overall survival was significantly lower in patients with low CCR (< 0.66) versus those with high CCR (≥ 0.66). Furthermore, HGS, SMI, and sarcopenia had comparable diagnostic value. Conclusions CCR is a simple, noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of sarcopenia in patients with LC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shibamoto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4b9eb18185d8a3980211fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70156
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing renal function in cirrhotic patients: Problems and pitfalls2003 · 336 citations
  2. 2The Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII) Combined with the Creatinine-to-Cystatin C Ratio (Cre/CysC) Predicts Sarcopenia in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Complicated with Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma2023 · 8 citations
  3. 3Muscle Wasting Is Associated With Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis2011 · 810 citations
  4. 4Evaluating Muscle Mass by Using Markers of Kidney Function: Development of the Sarcopenia Index2016 · 339 citations
  5. 5Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function2013 · 988 citations