Case study reports medulloblastoma linked to germline ELP1 variant in siblings, suggesting further genetic screening is necessary.
Background Medulloblastoma (MB), the most common malignant brain tumor in children, is categorized into four molecular groups: WNT-activated, SHH-activated, group 3, and group 4. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revealed pathogenic variants (PVs) in germline cancer predisposition genes in approximately 5% of MB patients. MB-SHH, in particular, is linked to Gorlin syndrome (PTCH1, SUFU) and Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53). Recently, germline heterozygous PVs in Elongator Complex Protein 1 (ELP1) were identified in 15% of MB-SHH patients. Despite this, the risk of developing MB in ELP1 PV carriers is low (1%), and no screening guidelines have been established. Here, we present two half-siblings with MB-SHH, both carrying a germline ELP1 PV. Methods A retrospective review of medical records was performed to collect clinical and genetic data on the siblings and their family. Case A 10-year-old boy was diagnosed with MB-SHH (TP53 wild-type) at our institution. Tumor profiling via NGS revealed biallelic deletion in PTCH1, FANCC, and DDX3X, while paired germline sequencing was normal. Enhanced exome sequencing through the NCI Molecular Characterization Initiative identified a germline PV in ELP1 (c.4C>T; p.Arg2Ter). A year earlier, his 4-year-old half-sister had been diagnosed with MB-SHH, also carrying the same ELP1 germline PV. Familial testing confirmed the germline ELP1 PV in their mother and two additional siblings. MRI screening for mutation-positive children is ongoing. Discussion This case highlights an important association between germline heterozygous ELP1 PVs and MB-SHH risk. Although the reported risk of MB-SHH in ELP1 PV carriers is low, it is significantly higher than the general population risk (0.007–0.011%). As ELP1 is a newly identified MB-SHH susceptibility gene, its associated risk may be underestimated. Incorporating ELP1 into sequencing panels for MB-SHH and cascade testing for at-risk relatives of mutation-positive individuals is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: