Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work demonstrates real-time monitoring of biogas flow and composition in UASB reactors, indicating efficient energy recovery potential from wastewater treatment.
UASB reactors are widely employed in wastewater treatment due to their operational simplicity and the potential for energy recovery from biogas, although continuous, low-cost monitoring of CH4 and flow rate remains challenging. This work presents the development and validation of an IoT system for remote, real-time monitoring, integrating NDIR sensors for CH4/CO2, a temperature sensor, a pressure sensor, a thermal mass flow meter, and an ESP32 platform with web/mobile interfaces. Deployment was carried out in a bench-scale UASB reactor treating an industrial slaughterhouse effluent. Over 30 days of continuous operation, stable data transmission was recorded with an average latency of ∼1.77 s; measurements covered 42.84–76.16 NL·d–1 (flow) and 53.31–88.0% (CH4), with temperature within a narrow mesophilic range (22.25–27.80 °C) and near-zero sensor drift. Estimates based on removed chemical oxygen demand (COD), normalized to STP, yielded 45.18–74.72 NL·d–1 (flow). Temporal agreement with the measured series was observed (MAE = 6.58 NL·d–1 and 4.69 percentage points; MAPE = 9.88% and 6.69% for flow and composition, respectively). This modular, fault-tolerant architecture demonstrates feasibility for supporting operational control and assessing the methane energy potential in decentralized applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nunes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: