PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Genes0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Accuracy of Machine Learning and GBLUP for Predicting Genomic Estimated Breeding Values in Chickens

View Full Paper
HCHaoxiang ChaiYYYuqi YangDWDan Wang

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the accuracy of machine learning models and GBLUP for predicting genomic breeding values in chickens.
  • Utilized whole-genome resequencing data from 834 WLGS laying hens.
  • Predicted genomic breeding values for eight egg production and quality traits using MLP, RF, and GBLUP.
  • Evaluated model performance through 10-fold cross-validation, examining the effects of data type and SNP density.
  • Moderate heritability for egg number at 0.327, high heritability for egg weight traits (0.570–0.631).
  • RF performed best for egg shape index and most egg quality traits, while GBLUP excelled for egg weight traits.
  • GBLUP improved EW-40W prediction accuracy by 24.9% compared to lower density conditions.

Abstract

Background: Machine learning (ML) holds great promise for genomic breeding value prediction in livestock and poultry, yet its application in layer breeding remains limited. Methods: In this study, we used whole-genome resequencing data from 834 Wenshui Luhua Green-Shelled (WLGS) laying hens to predict genomic breeding values for eight egg production and egg quality traits using multilayer perceptron (MLP), random forest (RF), and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). Model performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation, and the effects of data type and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density were examined. Results: Heritability analysis indicated moderate heritability for egg number (EN) at 0.327. Egg weight-related traits (EW-30W, EW-40W, and EHD-40W) exhibited high heritability (0.570–0.631), while eggshell strength (ESS-40W) and thickness (EST-40W) showed moderate heritability at 0.228 and 0.220, respectively. Model comparisons revealed that RF performed best for egg shape index (ESI-30W, 0.395) and most egg quality traits, whereas GBLUP yielded optimal results for egg weight traits, achieving prediction accuracies of 0.392 for EW-30W and 0.432 for EW-40W. Whole-genome resequencing data consistently outperformed 50K chip data across all models, with GBLUP improving EW-40W prediction accuracy by 24.9%. SNP density analysis further showed that GBLUP remained stable under low-density conditions, while MLP and RF progressively improved with increasing density, with RF demonstrating the most pronounced advantage at high densities. Conclusions: In summary, the GBLUP model is suitable for traits with high heritability and low-density marker scenarios, while the RF model demonstrates significant predictive advantages for egg production and specific egg quality traits under high-density conditions. This study provides scientific basis for model selection in the genomic selection program for laying hens.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ba0818185d8a3980279chttps://doi.org/10.3390/genes17030315
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper