PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Cancer Letters2 citationsOpen Access

Resistance of BRAFV600E-mutant melanoma to Vemurafenib: a senescence-induced swing from differentiation to blastulation followed by proliferation

View Full Paper
FRFēlikss RūmnieksNVNinel M. VainshelbaumKSKristīne Salmiņa

Key Points

  • The research examines how BRAFV600E melanoma cells develop resistance to Vemurafenib through changes in cell fate.
  • Examined a metastatic paratetraploid melanoma cell line, SkMel28, in response to Vemurafenib treatment.
  • Analyzed transcriptomic and phenotypic changes during treatment, focusing on cell fate dynamics.
  • Assessed senescence, autophagy, and cell proliferation outcomes following Vemurafenib exposure.
  • Vemurafenib treatment suppressed pERK, causing senescence and changes in neuro-melanogenesis.
  • Cell responses included multinucleation, melanin remnants, and hyperploidy arrangements resembling embryonic structures.
  • Transitioning between cell fates demonstrated a biphasic response, supporting the activation of alternative pathways like vascularisation.

Abstract

Resistance to Vemurafenib (VEM), a targeted BRAFV600E inhibitor, was examined in the metastatic paratetraploid (XX, abnormal Y chromosome) melanoma cell line, SkMel28. During the first week of treatment, pERK suppression coincided with transcriptomic and phenotypic changes related to senescence, autophagy/mitophagy, neuro-melanogenesis, and cell co-alignment. By the second week, MAPK–ERK signalling was restored, coinciding with surmounting the G1/S checkpoint, G2M checkpoint delay, mitotic slippage (MS), and downregulation of senescence and melanogenesis. The dynamics of melanogenesis and MS were highly correlated. By days 12–15, ∼8% of cells with melanin remnants exhibited hyperploidy and multinucleation, some arranged as rosettes, encased by a Zona pellucida-positive structure reminiscent of oocytes, zygotes, or blastulae, occasionally yielding cellularised sub-cells or stalling in diapause. These parasexual processes eventually ceased; cells resumed proliferative clonogenic growth and their initial mito-meiotic, mesenchymal profile. Transcriptomic analysis confirmed the reversal of their cell fate direction: from senescence-induced neuro-melanogenesis to its suppression and activation of female meiosis–like and mitosis states. The transition point of this cell-fate reversal coincided with S-phase resumption, highlighted by replication delay and activation of the FOS–TEAD/Hippo axis of the “female pregnancy” (stress-response, embryonal placentation, vascularisation, stemness, anti-apoptosis) gene ontology module. We conclude that resistance to VEM in SkMel28 cells encompasses the transition between three possible cell fates: (1) senescence/differentiation, (2) reprogramming/blastulation, and (3) recovery of the proliferative mito-meiotic profile. The coexpression of senescence, reprogramming and gametogenetic genes in a dataset of late-stage melanoma patient samples supports these results. • Vemurafenib targeting BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma acts in a multi-step process • ERK suppression induces senescence and neuro-melanogenesis; reinitiated pERK activates ‘female pregnancy’ • Ontogeny reversal creates migratory or dormant multinucleated rosette-like “embryos” • Cellularised offspring resume proliferation and return to mito-meiotic profile • Senescence, stemness, and gametogenesis are coexpressed in primary melanoma

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rūmnieks et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4ba0818185d8a398028b6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2026.218430
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper