Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Article critiques Holland's approach to textual criticism of Revelation 22:19, indicating standards are not met in evaluating primary and secondary sources.
With Thomas Holland’s lengthy discussion of a reading in Rev 22:19 as an example, this article shows how Holland’s way of doing New Testament textual criticism falls short on all academic standards. With respect to the main issue, Erasmus’ retranslation of the final verses of Revelation, Holland fails to properly find, address and evaluate both primary and secondary sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Krans (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: