Qualitative case study reveals practice-based research facilitates scholarly identity in doctoral education, suggesting supportive mentoring structures.
This qualitative case study examines how two doctoral students in a Curriculum and Instruction program negotiated scholarly identity through sustained participation in a faculty-led Elementary Education Special Interest Group (SIG). Guided by a situated framework of scholarly identity, the study analyzes mentoring transcripts and participant reflections to examine how scholarly participation and positioning were mediated within a practice-based research context. Findings identify five themes across three domains: entry into scholarly practice, collaborative engagement, and evolving scholarly identity. The study offers implications for mentoring structures that support practitioner-scholars in non-traditional or part-time doctoral pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: