The study demonstrates a new method for estimating low-frequency oscillatory stability in power systems, suggesting improved analysis techniques.
• A generalized Kron-reduction method to accurately derive the exact characteristic equation. • Theoretical proof on merits of magnitude-angle criterion in low-frequency oscillation analysis. • Proposed framework assessing low-frequency oscillations with limited system observability. Compared with damping torque analysis and eigenvalue-based methods, the impedance method demonstrates its superiority in power system oscillation studies when detailed models are unavailable. However, existing impedance methods used in wide-frequency oscillation have modeling and stability criterion limitations in analyzing low-frequency oscillations. Therefore, this paper proposes a generalized Kron-Reduction based stability estimation method (GKRSME), which aims to accurately estimate low-frequency oscillatory stability margin and tackle the above-mentioned limitations. Firstly, it is mathematically proved in the paper that existing π–type circuit-based lumped impedance (LIM) cannot derive characteristic equation accurately. A generalized Kron-Reduction is hence proposed to replace existing modeling method. Secondly, a comparative analysis is conducted between two stability criteria to elucidate their applicability to low-frequency oscillation analysis. It is revealed that stability criterion based on real and imaginary parts of LIM determinant (RIC) has nonnegligible errors in studying oscillations in low-frequency range due to inaccurate assumption, i.e., the imaginary part is much larger than the real part of the mode. In contrast, a stability criterion based on magnitude and angle of LIM determinant (MAC) is a more suitable alternative for low-frequency oscillation analysis, which can accurately estimate the stability margin. Additionally, modified IEEE-39 and IEEE-68 bus power systems with converters are used to validate the proposed GKRSME.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: