PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of Affective Disorders3 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy and safety of accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation on suicidality in depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JJJithin Thekkelkuthiyathottil JosephJSJyothi Vettiyattusserril SisirkumarGGGopika Gopal

Key Points

  • This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (aTMS) for reducing suicidality in individuals with depressive disorders.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and open-label studies.
  • Included participants aged over 12 with depressive disorders and suicidality.
  • Assessed primary outcome as change in suicidal ideation severity using validated scales.
  • Evaluated secondary outcomes including response rates, depressive symptoms, and adverse effects.
  • Used a random-effects model for meta-analyses and assessed risk of bias.
  • Thirteen studies (7 RCTs, 6 open-label; N = 625) met inclusion criteria; six RCTs (N = 310) included in meta-analysis.
  • aTMS showed no significant improvement in suicidality compared to sham or standard TMS (SMD = 0.17).
  • Response rates were not significantly better for aTMS (OR = 1.55).
  • Mild adverse effects were more frequent with aTMS (OR = 1.95), but dropout rates were similar (OR = 1.47).
  • Feasibility of aTMS appears acceptable, and open-label studies suggest benefits of personalized targeting.

Abstract

Accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (aTMS), which delivers multiple stimulation sessions per day over a condensed treatment period, has been proposed as a rapid intervention for suicidality in depressive disorders, but the quality and certainty of supporting evidence remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of aTMS in reducing suicidality. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through April 30, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label studies on aTMS (≥2 sessions/day) in individuals aged >12 years with depressive disorders and suicidality. The primary outcome was change in suicidal ideation severity, assessed using validated clinician-rated or self-reported suicidality scales. Secondary outcomes included suicidality at follow-up, response rates, depressive symptoms, adverse effects, and dropout rates. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was rated via GRADE. Meta-analyses used a random-effects model. Thirteen studies (7 RCTs, 6 open-label; N = 625) met inclusion criteria; six RCTs ( N = 310) were included in the meta-analysis. aTMS showed no significant advantage over sham or standard TMS for suicidality post-treatment (SMD = 0.17; 95% CI −0.62, 0.95), at follow-up (SMD = 0.76; −0.14, 1.65), or for depressive symptoms (SMD = 1.05; −0.28, 2.39). Suicidality response (OR = 1.55) showed a non-significant trend favoring aTMS. Adverse effects were generally mild but more frequent with aTMS (OR = 1.95); dropout rates were similar (OR = 1.47). Current evidence does not support accelerated TMS as superior to sham or standard TMS for reducing suicidality; however, its feasibility appears acceptable. Open-label studies suggest potential benefits of personalized, fMRI-guided targeting approaches. Interpretation of these findings is limited by substantial heterogeneity in stimulation protocols and comparator conditions across included trials. PROSPERO registration : CRD42024623555. • Accelerated TMS was not effective for suicidality in depression, compared to sham aTMS or standard rTMS. • Open-label studies suggest potential benefits of aTMS using fMRI-guided, personalized targeting. • Accelerated TMS was well tolerated with mild adverse effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joseph et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fa6fb39f7826a300b311https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121540
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper