Prospective cohort study evaluates RDW and NLR's association with cardiovascular risk in obstructive sleep apnea, suggesting enhanced patient risk assessment.
Objective To evaluate the prognostic association of baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and their combined index with 3-year composite cardiovascular events in moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled 620 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/h) from 2020–2022. Participants were categorized by baseline medians into low-risk (both low), intermediate-risk (one high), and high-risk (both high) groups. The primary outcome was composite cardiovascular events. Cox regression, ROC curves, NRI, and IDI assessed predictive performance. Results During median follow-up of 36.2 months, 72 events occurred (11.6% rate). Each 1% increase in RDW (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15–1.52) and each 1-unit increase in NLR (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.20–1.66) were independently associated with cardiovascular events (both p < 0.001). The high-risk group showed 2.98-fold higher risk than low-risk group (HR = 2.98, 95%CI: 1.36–6.52, p = 0.006) with significant dose–response relationship ( p = 0.002). The combined RDW-NLR index showed better discrimination (AUC = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.65–0.81) compared with RDW alone (0.65) or NLR alone (0.67). Adding the combined index to traditional risk factors and OSA parameters significantly improved reclassification (NRI = 0.42, p = 0.001; IDI = 0.032, p = 0.009). The association was more pronounced in patients aged ≥60 years, males, and those with poor CPAP adherence. Conclusion The combined RDW-NLR index is a simple, accessible prognostic marker of cardiovascular events in moderate-to-severe OSA patients, providing additional risk stratification value beyond traditional risk factors for clinical risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: