PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry2 citationsOpen Access

Are monolithic zirconia complete arch implant-supported prostheses reliable? A systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
AMAna Catarina Mota de MatosFVFernanda Leal VieiraJMJulio Ruiz Marrara

Key Points

  • To evaluate the reliability of monolithic zirconia complete arch implant-supported prostheses.
  • Systematic review of available literature
  • Meta-analysis of cumulative function rates
  • Assessment of technical and biological complications
  • High cumulative proportions of prostheses remained functional
  • Low rates of technical complications noted
  • Low rates of biological complications observed

Abstract

Monolithic zirconia complete arch implant-supported prostheses demonstrated high cumulative proportions of prostheses remaining in function and low rates of technical and biological complications within the reported follow-up periods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fa9ab39f7826a300b547https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2026.02.006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper