Case report reveals diagnostic uncertainty between myeloma and crystal-storing histiocytosis in an elderly male, indicating complexities in hematological diagnoses.
A 77-year-old male with a 7-year history of IgG-κ (IgG kappa) multiple myeloma presented with chest pain; white blood cell count of 3.1 × 109/L; haemoglobin concentration of 100 g/L; platelet count of 235 × 109/L; serum total protein of 62.2 g/L, globulin of 34.1 g/L; serum creatinine of 87 μmol/L; and serum calcium of 2.00 mmol/L. The blood film showed 1% plasma cells. Bone marrow aspirate films showed 10% abnormal giant cells with intracytoplasmic Auer rod-shaped inclusions or abundant irregular purple inclusions (left, Wright–Giemsa stain, 10 × objective; middle-right, 100 × objective) and 85% myeloma cells. There was diagnostic uncertainty as to the lineage of these cells, with giant plasma cells as part of myeloma or crystal-storing histiocytes being possibilities. Flow cytometric analysis showed that 73.56% myeloma cells were positive for CD38, CD138, CD56, CD9 (dim), CD117 and cKappa while negative for CD45, CD19, CD20, CD27, CD28, CD33, CD81 and cLambda. Crystal-storing histiocytosis (CSH) is a rare, non-neoplastic histiocytic proliferation characterised by the accumulation of histiocytes containing intracytoplasmic crystalline immunoglobulin inclusions, typically kappa light chains, and is most commonly associated with underlying lymphoproliferative or plasma cell disorders.1-3 Histiocytes in crystal-storing histiocytosis are characterized by abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm containing elongated, needle-like or globular crystalline inclusions that are typically non-refractile and non-polarizable in bone marrow aspirates.3-6 Finally, the diagnosis was established as myeloma with CSH. The authors declared that this study received no financial support. This study did not involve personal information; only laboratory data were reported. Patient consent was, therefore, waived by the Ethics Committee of The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: