Systematic review reveals AI improves diagnostic accuracy for root resorption, suggesting clinical enhancements.
AI shows high accuracy for ERR/ECR, particularly with CBCT and transformer/hybrid models, yet moderate heterogeneity and limited generalizability warrant cautious interpretation. AI should augment, not replace, clinician judgment within explainable, standardized workflows. Priorities include open multicenter annotated datasets, harmonized thresholds/protocols, and external validation to enable reliable clinical adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: