Demonstrates a novel classification framework for monitoring shelterbelts in agroforestry ecosystems, indicating effective ecological management tools.
As a typical agroforestry ecosystem, farmland shelterbelts (FSs) play a pivotal role in delivering ecological and economic benefits and have been widely implemented worldwide. However, their fragmented distribution, irregular boundaries, and strong spectral similarity to adjacent land-cover types lead to severe spectral confusion in remote sensing imagery, posing significant challenges for accurate regional identification and monitoring. To address these issues, we propose a Shelterbelt Phenological Classification (SPC) framework that leverages the phenological characteristics of FSs. By integrating multi-temporal Sentinel-2 spectral, textural, and change information, the framework effectively captures the dynamic characteristics of FSs in Northeast China and, in combination with four mainstream classifiers, generates 10-m spatiotemporal distribution maps for 2019–2023. The results indicate a continuous increase in the total length of shelterbelts in Northeast China during the study period, with the proposed method achieving an overall accuracy of 90.2% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.88. This study provides a novel and effective solution for regional-scale mapping and monitoring of FSs in Northeast China and offers valuable methodological references for remote sensing-based monitoring of agroforestry ecosystems in the region. • A novel framework (SPC) suitable for large-scale shelterbelt classification was proposed. • Phenological window optimization and spectral-textural feature fusion markedly improved shelterbelt separability and classification accuracy. • The optimal results were achieved by the Random Forest algorithm among the four compared classification models. • A 10-m annual shelterbelt dataset for Northeast China from 2019 to 2023 was produced, revealing an overall increasing trend in shelterbelt length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: