PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Plant Stress0 citationsOpen Access

Killers or Protectors: Contrasting Roles of Alfalfa SIMKK and PRKK in Nicotiana benthamiana Cell Death

View Full Paper
JSJiří SojkaILIvan LuptovčiakDNDominik Novák

Key Points

  • The research investigates how alfalfa MAPK kinases SIMKK and PRKK influence cell death during pathogen attacks.
  • Conducted in vitro kinase assays to assess activation of downstream targets by MAPKKs.
  • Co-transformed SIMKK and PRKK with various MAPKs in Nicotiana benthamiana for functional analysis.
  • Used microscopy to observe localization of fluorescently-tagged proteins.
  • Recorded phenotypic observations including symptoms of cell death and reactive oxygen species levels.
  • SIMKK showed greater activation than PRKK, particularly when paired with SIMK or SAMK.
  • SIMKK overexpression led to increased reactive oxygen species and cell death symptoms.
  • PRKK overexpression appeared to suppress cell death, indicating a protective role against excessive cell death.

Abstract

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) play important roles in immune signalling pathways following pathogen attack or elicitor treatment. A key plant defence strategy is a localised cell death (CD) mechanism that restricts pathogen spread. This study investigated the potential role of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ) MAPK kinases (MAPKKs) and MAPK pairs in regulating CD. In vitro kinase assays confirmed that STRESS-INDUCED MAPKK (SIMKK) and PATHOGEN-RESPONSIVE MAPKK (PRKK) could activate downstream targets, including STRESS-INDUCED MAPK (SIMK), STRESS-ACTIVATED MAPK (SAMK), MEDICAGO MAPK 2 (MMK2), and MEDICAGO MAPK 3 (MMK3). SIMKK was more active than PRKK, with the highest activation observed in SIMKK combinations with SIMK and SAMK, perhaps associated with CD. To study this, SIMKK and PRKK were co-transformed pairwise with SIMK, SAMK, MMK2 , and MMK3 in Nicotiana benthamiana , representing a reliable in planta expression system. Microscopy revealed co-localisation of fluorescently-tagged MAPKKs with MAPKs in nuclei and cytoplasm. In the case of the SIMKK–SAMK combination, stress granule (SG)-like structures appeared in the cytoplasm, and phenotypic observations showed CD symptoms including increased level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) two days and death tissues six days post-transformation. Further phenotype analysis indicated that SIMKK pairwise overexpression with SAMK or SIMK induced ROS production and CD, suggesting SIMKK promotes immune signalling that may restrict pathogen invasion. Conversely, PRKK overexpression with the same MAPKs suppressed ROS production and CD, suggesting a protective role against excessive CD. These findings highlight a differential function between SIMKK and PRKK, offering a basis for enhancing alfalfa disease resistance through genetic approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sojka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb1bb39f7826a300bae4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2026.101334
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper