PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Journal of Cleaner Production2 citationsOpen Access

Exploring systemic challenges in wastewater reuse for agriculture: A modified Delphi and cross-impact analysis approach

View Full Paper
ECErick Mauricio Corimanya-YucraMNMarcelo Antunes Nolasco

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify and analyze the interconnected barriers to sustainable wastewater reuse in Brazilian agriculture.
  • Utilized a mixed-methods approach incorporating a Delphi survey with 40 experts.
  • Conducted a Cross-Impact Analysis to assess relationships among 12 barriers.
  • Focused on multiple dimensions including governance, infrastructure, financial, social, and environmental factors.
  • Governance deficiencies emerged as the dominant barriers influencing wastewater reuse.
  • Insufficient Public Policies and Absence of National Legislation were identified as critical drivers of the challenges.
  • A causal cascade was observed from governance to finance and then to infrastructure, indicating strong interdependencies.
  • Influence intensities showed financial constraints transmit policy failures effectively.

Abstract

Wastewater reuse stands as a pivotal strategy for addressing agricultural water scarcity; however, its adoption in Brazil remains constrained by interconnected barriers that have been examined in isolation rather than systemically. To bridge this gap, this study identifies and analyzes the interdependencies among barriers to sustainable wastewater reuse in Brazilian agriculture. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating a two-round Delphi survey with 40 experts and Cross-Impact Analysis to quantify systemic relationships among 12 barriers across governance, infrastructure, financial, social, and environmental dimensions. The findings reveal a hierarchical structure dominated by governance deficiencies. Insufficient Public Policies (G4) emerged as the dominant driver (Active Sum = 19.04), followed by Absence of National Legislation (G5, AS = 17.76). The analysis uncovered a critical causal cascade: governance gaps propagate through financial constraints (F1) to infrastructure deficiencies, with influence intensities of 2.75 and 2.50 representing the strongest pathways. These outcomes underscore that regulatory reform constitutes the necessary precondition for unlocking investment. The integrated Delphi-CIA framework provides actionable insights for policymakers in water-stressed regions facing similar institutional challenges worldwide. • Governance barriers (G4, G5) dominate as system drivers (Active Sum >17). • Analysis reveals a causal cascade: governance .→ finance → infrastructure. • Financial constraints transmit policy failures with high intensity (2.75). • Infrastructure barriers are reactive outcomes, not root causes. • Delphi-CIA framework identifies leverage points for policy sequencing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corimanya-Yucra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb8db39f7826a300bcf4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.147899
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper