PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Materials & Design0 citationsOpen Access

Multimodal ensemble defect detection and self-healing in laser-based powder bed fusion

View Full Paper
NDNikan DoostiONOlli NyrhiläJAJan Sher Akmal

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate AI-aided methods for detecting and healing defects in laser-based powder bed fusion.
  • Manipulated build parameters to induce defects in test specimens.
  • Utilized optical tomography (OT) and meltpool monitoring (MPM) systems for thermal signature capture.
  • Developed a late-fusion ensemble deep learning pipeline for defect detection.
  • Verified defect detection results using optical metallography.
  • OT and MPM provided distinct, complementary information for defect detection.
  • Score-level fusion of OT and MPM improved prediction confidence compared to single-modality models.
  • Self-healing of defective layers was confirmed after exposure to near-standard process conditions.

Abstract

In this study, we developed a process that allows for evaluating artificial intelligence-aided detection and self-healing of defects in the proximity of standard process conditions. The build parameters were manipulated to seed defects in a tailor-made notch area of the test specimen. A near-infrared Scientific Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (sCMOS)-based optical tomography (OT) system and a dual-photodiode-based meltpool monitoring (MPM) system were used to capture layer-wise thermal signatures of these process variations. Based on these data, a lightweight late-fusion ensemble deep learning pipeline was developed to evaluate defect detection using modality-specific predictions, and the results were verified by optical metallography. This work examines whether two widely available, imaging in-situ sensing modalities can provide distinct and complementary information for defect detection. The results show that OT and MPM capture different aspects of the process, and that their score-level fusion improves prediction confidence relative to single-modality models in the present controlled experimental setting. Separately, defects in the notch area comprising up to 7 defective layers were healed when the region was subsequently exposed to under near-standard process parameters, confirming the self-healing phenomenon. These self-healing observations motivate the need for reliable in-situ defect identification as a prerequisite for future detect-and-heal process control. Overall, the study highlights a practical route toward accessible, cost-effective imaging quality monitoring in resource-constrained additive manufacturing environments, hence lowering the barrier to entry in this domain. • Self-induced porosity in laser-based powder bed fusion, by varying volumetric energy density close to natural process. • Capture of distinct process cues via optical tomography (OT) and meltpool monitoring (MPM) imaging sensors. • In-situ defect detection via OT and MPM modalities as cost-effective in-situ monitoring for resource-constrained environments. • High-confidence complementary global (OT) and local (MPM) defect signature quantification using multimodal ensemble learning. • Investigation of self-healing defective regions up to 7 layers, when exposed by the standard VED, motivates ”detect-and-heal” closed-loop control.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Doosti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fb9db39f7826a300bf2ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115826
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper