Phase Ib trial evaluates Alocelyvir's safety and tolerability in pediatric patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, suggesting potential immune response.
Background Relapsed medulloblastoma continues to have a grim prognosis despite advances in the biological understanding of this tumor. In recent years, oncolytic adenovirus therapy has emerged as a promising approach for brain tumors. Methods We conducted a Phase Ib clinical trial in patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, using ALOCELYVIR, a combination of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells carrying an oncolytic adenovirus. ALOCELYVIR was administered as monotherapy in weekly infusions over 8 doses at 0.5x106 cells/kg/dose. MRI was performed at week 10th, and patients with progression were withdrawn from the trial. The primary objective was to evaluate safety. PCR adenovirus in plasma, anti-adenovirus type 5 antibodies, and immune reconstitution were analyzed. Results Six patients, median age 16.5 years (range, 5–18), with disseminated medulloblastoma (M3) were enrolled. Molecular group 4 (3), group 3/4 (1), group 3 (1), and unknown (1). Patients were heavily pretreated before trial enrollment: median of 3 treatment lines (range, 2–6), including MEMMAT in all but one. All patients completed the 8 planned doses of ALOCELYVIR. Adverse events were mild (no grade 3/4/5). Most frequent adverse events were grade 1 fever, asthenia, myalgias, and anorexia. Adenovirus replication was detected in all patients. Despite week 10 MRI-confirmed progression in all patients, 5 patients pursued additional therapies (5 chemotherapy, 1 radiotherapy), achieving 4 partial responses and 1 stable disease. Survival following trial withdrawal was 27 months, 14 months, 12 months, and 2 months respectively, with two patients remaining alive at 20- and 3-months post-trial. Conclusions This Phase Ib trial demonstrates the feasibility and safety of ALOCELYVIR monotherapy in recurrent medulloblastoma. The prolonged survival observed in most patients after initial progression may indicate an immune-mediated response to ALOCELYVIR. These findings underscore the need for further studies in larger clinical trials to fully explore the therapeutic potential of ALOCELYVIR in improving outcomes for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lassaletta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: