The study demonstrates how taxation can optimize fishing fleets and resource management in fisheries, suggesting practical implications for sustainability.
As an alternative to rights-based commons management, we illustrate how open access combined with taxes can be used to optimally structure a fishing fleet and efficiently allocate harvest across a portfolio of species between vessel groups within a static setting. Biological over-exploitation is prevented through externally imposed limits on total output. A case-study based on data from Norway’s fisheries sector is used to illustrate our tax-based framework. Greater tax flexibility brings the solution closer to the first-best outcome. If implementing a flexible tax proves challenging for social or political reasons, even less flexible taxes can capture a significant portion of the resource rent and improve the composition of inputs as a second-best alternative. The taxes are easy to administer as they are collected on first-hand delivery. • Ad valorem taxes offer a simpler, flexible alternative to rights-based fisheries systems. • Combining taxes with Total Allowable Catches (TAC) ensures sustainability, efficiency, and optimal fleet use. • Tax options range from flexible to uniform, balancing efficiency and political acceptance. • Norwegian data show taxes can manage fisheries and capture major resource rents. • Ideal for developing fisheries sectors seeking fair, efficient, and sustainable management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekerhovd et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: