This article examines work-life balance challenges among transgender individuals, suggesting inclusion pathways to improve their experiences in workplaces.
This article examines work–life balance (WLB) among transgender individuals from a human resource management (HRM) perspective, arguing that WLB should not be reduced to an individual coping issue but understood as an outcome shaped by unequal institutional and organizational arrangements that distribute risk, dignity, and opportunity unevenly. Using a conceptual, integrative review design, the study synthesizes insights from WLB scholarship, minority stress theory, transgender employment research, policy discourse, and socio- demographic realities in India to build a multi-level analytical framework connecting macro- level structural stigma, meso-level workplace climate and HR architecture, and micro-level identity-related stress processes to WLB outcomes. The analysis shows that transgender employees encounter layered barriers, including chronic psychological strain linked to concealment and minority stress, recurrent discrimination and misgendering, economic insecurity rooted in labor-market exclusion, and administrative burdens associated with legal and organizational identity transitions. These pressures collectively heighten work–family conflict, emotional exhaustion, burnout vulnerability, and disengagement from organizational life. In response, the paper identifies actionable inclusion pathways: enforceable anti-discrimination mechanisms, structured transition-support protocols, gender-affirming benefits, inclusive facilities, leadership accountability, and psychosocial safety systems. Practically, the study emphasizes that transgender inclusion must be embedded in core HR systems rather than treated as symbolic diversity rhetoric, with implementation quality monitored through measurable indicators such as retention and promotion parity, pay-equity diagnostics, climate metrics, and grievance-resolution outcomes. Socially, improving WLB for transgender workers advances labor justice, mental health equity, and decent work while strengthening participation in formal employment and broader social inclusion. The article’s central contribution is a focused HRM framework that integrates identity, institutional context, and organizational practice into a unified model for inclusion, offering relevance for emerging economies such as India as well as global workplaces seeking evidence-based transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hakim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: