Demonstrates improved crop type mapping accuracy in pre-Sentinel era using self-supervised learning and Landsat data, suggesting effective agricultural monitoring.
Crop type mapping is crucial for agricultural land cover monitoring and decision-making. State-of-the-art methods developed using recent Sentinel satellite data have already demonstrated their ability to accurately map crop types. However, crop type mapping for the pre-Sentinel era remains challenging due to the limited availability of higher spatial- and temporal-resolution data. This study addresses this knowledge gap by leveraging variable-length Landsat satellite time-series (L-SITS) data in combination with a self-supervised learning model, SITS-BERT, for crop type mapping. This case study, conducted in two German districts, demonstrates the potential of mapping two different crop type levels (CTL1 - 5 and CTL2 - 9 classes) in the pre-Sentinel era. The SITS-BERT model, pre-trained on unlabelled L-SITS data, was fine-tuned on single-year and 3-year datasets and evaluated using past and future years’ data, compared with the model’s training data. The SITS-BERT model achieved overall accuracies of 0.78–0.83 and 0.64–0.76 for CTL1 and CTL2, respectively, with fine-tuning on single-year data. The model fine-tuned with 3 years achieved higher accuracies (0.81–0.85 and 0.72–0.78). The results showed that the SITS-BERT model finetuned with single-year data outperforms the baseline random forest model trained on single-year fixed-length L-SITS data. The study highlighted that, with this approach, limited number of available SITS observations can still be useful. The findings of this study demonstrated the potential of the SITS-BERT model with L-SITS data for crop-type mapping in the pre-Sentinel era, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of agricultural land cover dynamics and to the evaluation of agricultural policy impacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijesingha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: