A multicenter retrospective cohort study develops a nomogram to predict focal complications in brucellosis, suggesting improved risk assessment.
Background: Up to one-third of brucellosis patients develop focal organ involvement, contributing to increased morbidity and therapeutic failure, yet no clinically validated instrument exists to stratify risk at presentation. Methods: In this three-center retrospective cohort from Türkiye (2015–2025), 355 adults with confirmed brucellosis were enrolled. Thirty-two candidate variables spanning demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, routine laboratory values, and composite inflammation indices underwent LASSO-penalized regression with 10-fold cross-validation for predictor selection, after which a nomogram was constructed and internally validated via 1000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Results: Ninety-two patients (25.9%) developed focal complications. Five predictors were retained by LASSO—prognostic nutritional index (PNI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), chronic disease stage, and hypertension—and combined with age and sex (retained a priori) into a seven-predictor nomogram. PNI was the strongest contributor (OR = 0.901, 95% CI: 0.857–0.948). Apparent C-statistic reached 0.782 (optimism-corrected 0.762), with a calibration slope of 0.894 and Brier score of 0.154. Decision curve analysis indicated net clinical benefit over the 5–55% threshold probability range. Conclusions: This PNI-anchored LASSO nomogram offers a practical bedside risk stratification instrument for brucellosis-related focal involvement. Prospective external validation across geographically diverse endemic regions is warranted before clinical adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalmanoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: