PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Clinical Epigenetics0 citationsOpen Access

Distinct roles of chronotype, daytime napping, and sleep duration in biological and functional aging: a univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study

ZZZheng ZhangXWXinglian WangHQH. Qiu

Key Points

  • To determine the causal effects of chronotype, daytime napping, and sleep duration on biological and functional aging outcomes.
  • Used Mendelian randomization to estimate effects of sleep traits on aging outcomes.
  • Employed two-sample MR with large GWAS data for sleep traits and aging metrics.
  • Applied univariable MR for total effects and multivariable MR for direct effects, accounting for intercorrelations.
  • Utilized inverse-variance weighted approach and several sensitivity analyses.
  • Napping negatively correlated with telomere length and cognition, while showing positive links to GrimAge and frailty.
  • Chronotype associated positively with facial aging and cognitive decline.
  • Longer sleep duration inversely linked to frailty with stronger associations in multivariable analyses.

Abstract

Sleep traits have been linked to aging, but observational designs cannot separate correlated sleep behaviors or establish causality. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to estimate both total and direct effects of chronotype, daytime napping, and sleep duration on multidimensional aging outcomes. Two-sample MR used large GWAS instruments for the three sleep traits against leukocyte telomere length, facial ageing, epigenetic clocks (IEAA, HannumAge, PhenoAge, GrimAge), frailty index, and cognitive performance. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was primary, with MR-Egger, weighted median, and MR-PRESSO as sensitivity analyses. Univariable MR (UVMR) estimated total effects; multivariable MR (MVMR) estimated direct effects accounting for intercorrelations. In UVMR, napping was adversely associated with telomere length (β = − 0.11, 95% CI − 0.18 to − 0.05, PFDR = 0.002), facial ageing (β = 0.05, 0.01–0.09, PFDR = 0.036), GrimAge (β = 0.96, 0.09–1.83, PFDR = 0.048), frailty (β = 0.32, 0.20–0.45, PFDR < 0.001), and cognition (β = − 0.16, − 0.29 to − 0.03, PFDR = 0.036); HannumAge was nominal (β = 0.53, − 0.29–1.35, PFDR = 0.275). Chronotype related to HannumAge (β = 0.46, 0.15–0.78, PFDR = 0.032) with borderline links to IEAA (β = 0.36, 0.07–0.66, PFDR = 0.060) and poorer cognition (β = − 0.04, − 0.08 to − 0.01, PFDR = 0.060). Sleep duration was inversely associated with frailty (β = −0 .17, − 0.26 to − 0.08, PFDR = 0.001). In MVMR, napping retained associations with GrimAge (β = 1.08, 0.02–2.15, P = 0.046) and frailty (β = 0.29, 0.15–0.43, P < 0.001), while links to telomere length and cognition attenuated. Chronotype became protective for facial ageing (β = −0 .03, − 0.05 to − 0.01, P = 0.011) and cognition (β = 0.09, 0.01–0.17, P = 0.036) and showed no independent association with epigenetic clocks. The inverse association between sleep duration and frailty strengthened (β = − 0.36, − 0.49 to − 0.22, P < 0.001). Sleep traits show distinct, partly independent causal links with aging: excessive napping adversely influences GrimAge and frailty; longer sleep duration independently protects against frailty; and chronotype benefits facial ageing and cognition after accounting for other sleep behaviors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbc1b39f7826a300c39bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-026-02068-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper