PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Pediatric Transplantation0 citations

Twice‐Weekly Micafungin as Antifungal Prophylaxis in Children Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

View Full Paper
SRSyaza Ab RahmanXCXin Yee ChiewVJVida Jawin

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the efficacy of a twice-weekly micafungin regimen as antifungal prophylaxis in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
  • Analyzed 100 consecutive pediatric transplants from May 2018 to February 2024.
  • Administered micafungin at 3-5 mg/kg twice weekly from Day 0 until stable neutrophil engraftment.
  • Employed radiological evaluations and cultures for fungal infection status.
  • No proven or probable fungal infections were recorded in the cohort.
  • Eighteen percent of patients required a change to empirical antifungal treatment due to fever and possible infections.
  • Micafungin was tolerated well with no discontinuation due to safety concerns.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are at increased risk of developing invasive fungal infection. Micafungin is an echinocandin with broad‐spectrum antifungal properties. Recent trials have reported on the efficacy of intermittent daily dosing of micafungin for fungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients undergoing transplantation, with success rates of 76%–99%, success defined as absence of proven, probable, or possible invasive fungal infection. We implemented a twice‐weekly micafungin regimen as antifungal prophylaxis in our unit. Patients and Methods One hundred consecutive transplants performed between May 2018 and February 2024 were analyzed. Micafungin prophylaxis was dosed at 3–5 mg/kg daily given twice weekly from Day 0 till stable neutrophil engraftment, after which oral fluconazole was prescribed till Day +100. Fungal infection status was evaluated by radiological procedures and cultures from blood or sterile body sites as clinically indicated. The primary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of efficacy; secondary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Results Ninety three patients who underwent 95 transplants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Underlying diagnoses were: leukemia (47), inborn errors of immunity (11), other malignancies (11), hemoglobinopathy (8), and others (16). There were no proven or probable fungal infections. Seventeen patients (18%) required change from prophylaxis to empirical antifungal treatment for persistent fever ( n = 5) and possible fungal infections, mainly oesophagitis ( n = 8). All patients who failed micafungin prophylaxis received allogeneic transplants, and HLA‐haploidentical was the majority (14/17). None of the patients had to discontinue micafungin due to safety or tolerability concerns. Conclusions Twice‐weekly IV micafungin is a safe and effective option as antifungal prophylaxis for children undergoing HSCT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbd5b39f7826a300c3dchttps://doi.org/10.1111/petr.70296
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper