Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study identifies anti-tubercular therapy as the main cause of liver injury in patients, suggesting important clinical implications.
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause of acute liver failure in India, yet prospective data from northern India are rare. We analyzed drugs, clinical patterns, severity, and risk factors associated with DILI in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study (IEC letter no. XXII-PGTSC-IIA/P9; March 2023-February 2024) included 100 patients with DILI (alanine transaminase (ALT)≥5×upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT≥3×ULN plus bilirubin≥2×ULN). Causality assessment was performed using the Revised Electronic Causality Assessment Method (RECAM), and severity was classified by the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) scale. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of moderate-to-severe DILI (grades 3-5). Results: Average age was 52.6±16.1 years, with 51% male. Anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) was implicated in 39 (39%) cases, antibiotics in 20 (20%), antiepileptics in 17 (17%), and complementary/alternative medicines (CAM) in 7 (7%) cases. Hepatocellular injury was the most common pattern, observed in 46 (46%) patients, followed by mixed injury in 36 (36%) and cholestatic injury in 18 (18%) patients. Regarding severity, 58 (58%) patients had Grade 1+, 19 (19%) had Grade 2+, 15 (15%) had Grade 3+, 6 (6%) had Grade 4+, and 2 (2%) had Grade 5+ injury. Hypertension (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.14; 95% CI 1.65-57.40), diabetes (aOR 2.18; 95% CI 1.30-10.80), and CAM use (aOR 1.80; 95% CI 1.20-7.32) were independently associated with moderate-to-severe DILI. No clinical variable significantly predicted injury pattern. Conclusions: ATT remains the foremost DILI trigger in northern India. Metabolic comorbidities and CAM use were associated with increased severity. RECAM-guided causality and DILIN grading enhance bedside risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: