Dendrochronological analysis reveals drought resilience in Mediterranean shrubs, suggesting adaptability to climate change.
Climate warming, drought stress and aridification impact shrub radial growth in drylands, but our knowledge on climate-growth relationships of these species is limited. To fill this research gap, we studied the age, growth patterns and year-to-year variability of five shrub species ( Rhamnus alaternus , Rhamnus lycioides , Rhamnus saxatilis , Berberis vulgaris , and Retama sphaerocarpa ) under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions in nine sites, located near the xeric distribution limits of the study species in Spain. Shrubs showed short ( R. sphaerocarpa and B. vulgaris , 14−20 years) to intermediate lifespans ( Rhamnus species, 25−46 years), albeit a R. lycioides individual reached an age of 144 years. Accordingly, ring-widths varied from 2.02 mm in R. sphaerocarpa to 0.40 mm in R. lycioides . Both R. alaternus and R. lycioides showed negative growth-lifespan trade-offs. The ring-width series showed common growth variability between coexisting species ( R. alaternus and R. lycioides ) and also between sites for the same species ( R. sphaerocarpa , B. vulgaris ). Growth was constrained by elevated temperatures in early spring and summer, and enhanced by wet winter-to-spring conditions. A negative water balance from the previous October up to July limited growth. Growth-drought correlations peaked in the most arid site. Resilience indices varied between species and years. In general, shrubs showed good post-drought recovery. Our findings indicate favorable prospects for the study shrubs under more arid climate scenarios. • We quantified age, growth and drought resilience of five shrubs in drylands. • Age and growth rates varied widely (14−144 years, 0.40−2.02 mm). • Rhamnus alaternus and Rhamnus lycioides showed negative growth-lifespan trade-offs. • Shrub growth was constrained by dry winter-spring and warm spring-summer conditions. • Shrubs showed good post-drought recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camarero et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: