PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Reformulation of Article 412 Law Number 1 of 2023on Cohabitation from a Legal Certainty Perspective

View Full Paper
IAImera Azzahra AliviaPDPrija DjatmikaNAN. Aprilianda

Key Points

  • This research aims to examine the legal implications of the criminalization of cohabitation and propose a clearer regulatory framework for the offense in Indonesia.
  • Utilized normative juridical research methodology
  • Applied statutory and conceptual approaches
  • Analyzed ambiguous legal formulations and their consequences
  • Investigated complaint-based offense nature and complainant eligibility
  • Identified weaknesses that undermine the principle of lex certa
  • Highlighted risks of multiple interpretations of the law
  • Found potential for selective criminalization of cohabitation
  • Proposed reforms to clarify legal definitions and scope for complainants

Abstract

The criminalization of cohabitation under Article 412 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the National Criminal Code raises significant juridical concerns, particularly with regard to legal certainty and proportionality. This study focuses on examining the juridical implications arising from the formulation of Article 412 and on proposing an ideal regulatory framework for the criminal offense of cohabitation in Indonesia in the future. Employing a normative juridical research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes the consequences of ambiguous legal formulations, especially the vague elements of “living together as husband and wife outside marriage,” the complaint-based nature of the offense, and the unclear limitation of eligible complainants. The findings indicate that these weaknesses undermine the principle of lex certa, create risks of multiple interpretations, and potentially lead to selective criminalization and violations of legal certainty. Furthermore, the study argues that such deficiencies place Article 412 within the category of a voidable norm that may be subject to constitutional review. Accordingly, this research proposes a reformulation of Article 412 by clarifying and operationalizing the elements of the offense, restricting the scope of complaint-based prosecution, and explicitly defining the age limits of child complainants, in order to ensure legal certainty, proportionality, and the protection of human rights.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alivia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbf9b39f7826a300c7dfhttps://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.353
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper